Taking the Lowest Price Is Usually the Most Expensive Mistake
I'm an office administrator for a 120-person company. I manage all facility and appliance purchasing—roughly $180,000 annually across 15 vendors. I report to both operations and finance. When I took over purchasing in 2020, I was told my main job was to reduce costs. So I did exactly what you'd expect: I chased the cheapest price for everything.
But here's the thing: transparent pricing is worth paying for. The vendor who lists all fees upfront—even if the total looks higher—almost always costs less in the end. And I've learned this the hard way, especially when it comes to commercial appliances like LG refrigerators.
Let me tell you about my experience with a “great deal” on a refrigerator that taught me more than any spreadsheet could.
The Assumption That Cheap = Smart
People think expensive vendors deliver better quality. Actually, vendors who deliver quality can charge more. The causation runs the other way. When I saw a refrigerator priced $200 below the LG model I'd been eyeing, I thought I'd found a bargain. The spec sheet looked fine. The warranty seemed decent. I went with it.
That decision cost us nearly $1,200 in the first year.
Argument 1: The Actual Cost of a “Deal”
First, the “low price” wasn't exactly what I expected. The quote I received was for the base unit—no thermostat calibration, no delivery inside the building, no removal of the old unit. These “options” added $340. Then the installers found the electrical outlet needed updating. That was another $180 out of my department budget.
I've learned to ask “what's NOT included” before “what's the price.”The vendor who lists all fees upfront—even if the total looks higher—usually costs less in the end.
Processing 60-80 orders annually, I can tell you: the lowest upfront price rarely translates to the lowest cost a year from now.
Second, within six months, I was dealing with complaints. The refrigerator wasn't maintaining a consistent temperature. Employees complained their lunches weren't cold enough. I called for service. The manufacturer's warranty covered parts but not labor or travel—and the vendor I'd bought from had no local service center. I lost a day coordinating a third-party fix.
I went back and forth between the cheap vendor and a certified LG commercial dealer for a week. The cheap vendor offered a lower price; the LG dealer offered a package that included installation, calibration, and a direct service line. Ultimately, I chose the LG dealer because my fridge had already failed once.
Argument 2: Internal Customer Satisfaction Matters More Than Your P&L
People think the person signing the check is the only customer. Actually, the people using the appliance are your real customers. If they're unhappy, they go to their bosses. My VP heard about the lukewarm drinks within a week. That made me look bad.
The vendor who couldn't provide proper invoicing cost us $2,400 in rejected expenses. The supplier whose rushed delivery got the wrong model made me lose a weekend fixing the chaos. But the unreliable refrigerator? That affected the whole office. I had to spend my “people capital” just to keep the team patient while we waited for a fix.
Why does this matter? Because internally, you're the face of that purchase. If you can't deliver a working fridge, people question your other decisions. I've seen colleagues lose influence over a poorly chosen coffee machine. Appliances are visible. They're used daily. They matter.
Argument 3: Transparent Vendors Protect You from Yourself
The third, more uncomfortable truth is this: the best vendors don't just sell you a product. They protect you from your own short-term thinking.
When I approached a certified LG commercial dealer, they didn't just quote me a refrigerator. They asked: How many people use it? What's your peak load? Do you have a maintenance schedule? They included options—like a remote temperature monitoring system through the LG ThinQ platform—that I would never have thought of. Yes, it cost more on the invoice. But it saved us from another failure because we could see the temperature trending up before food went bad.
Did we save money? Yes. Was it worth the hassle? Jury's still out. But I'll tell you this: I stopped second-guessing after the first month. That peace of mind is worth something.
Addressing the Obvious Pushback
I know what you're thinking: “Not every budget has room for the premium option. Sometimes you have to make the cheap call work.” I get it. I've been there. In 2024, I had to consolidate orders for 400 employees across 3 locations. I couldn't upgrade everything at once.
But here's what I'd say: buy the cheap coil cleaner, not the cheap refrigerator. Prioritize. A $200 savings on a $1,500 unit is 13%. But if that unit fails and costs you a day of productivity across 120 people, your hourly cost is already higher. The fridge pays for itself in avoided downtime.
The assumption is that rush orders cost more because they're harder. The reality is they cost more because they're unpredictable and disrupt planned workflows. Paying a bit more upfront for a transparent deal reduces your need for expensive, disruptive fixes later.
My Bottom Line
I still have the bad fridge. It's been fixed—sort of. But it's stored in a back room, acting as a backup. And I use it as a reminder: the price is not the cost.
The vendor who lists all fees upfront—even if the total looks higher—usually costs less in the end. I've seen this pattern across 200+ orders. And I do not mean just a few dollars. I mean thousands of dollars in avoided headaches, callbacks, and internal complaints.
So the next time someone tells you they found a “deal” on an LG refrigerator, ask them what's not included. Ask them who services it. Ask them what happens when it breaks.
If they can't answer clearly, walk away. The $200 you save might cost you a lot more than you think.
Ask Lg about this sourcing topic